Absolutism 10 – Infinity

Why do Infinity or Infinities exist?

Actually, infinity(s) don’t exist. Yes, the idea or notion of infinity, i.e. not-finite exist. This has to do with the same Statement-Not-Statement: Every statement has Not-statement. It has to do with CONTRADICTION, with Contradiction being the key. It has to do with Infidefiception.

Whatever exists is finite, is existence, is statement. So, it has its ‘Not’/’Not-statement.

But why?

But why this then?

Well, the answer to is the same Statement-Not-Statement: Every statement has Not-statement: Contradiction is the key.

As discussed in Existence with no Justification, in Arbitrary Existence, in State[ment]verse, in NOTHING = EVERYTHING, and originally in ON THE NATURE OF NATURE, since in Statement-Not-Statement, i.e. State[ment]verse, any two statements, the statement and its ‘Not’/Not-statement are the non-existence of each other, complements of each other, they exist, they don’t exist, i.e. there ‘is’ existence-no-/non-existence (or existence-no-existence/non-existence)

[‘is’ here imples/indicates a link-up with Infidefiception, i.e. Infidefiception follows after ‘existence-no-/non-existence‘, i.e. ‘existence-no-/non-existence‘ implies Infidefiception]

So, Existence is Non-Existence, Nothing is Everything. So, there is no existence to justify in the first place. But there is as well, which is justified by Nothing, i.e. justified (again) by the ‘Not-statement’, by there ‘being’ Not-statement, non-existence. Yes, there is existence to be justified, (but existence does not exist), but existence is non-existence, and so there is no existence to be justified.

That’s why. That’s the reason. The reason is the no-reason, the no reason is the reason, the reason is NOTHING, the reason is EVERYTHING

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more