Particle – Anti-Particle

As mentioned in the article titled, “Existence with no Justification”: https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/07/existence-with-no-justification.html, Particle-AntiParticle (P-AP) is just a specific example of statement-not-statement i.e. of ‘statement A-statement B’, i.e. of ‘statement A-statement Not-A’, i.e. of ‘A-B’ i.e. of A-NotA (A-NA), (in the state[ment]verse).

Now the standard picture of ‘something from nothing’ is the creation of particle-antiparticle (P-AP) pair, called particle-antiparticle (P-AP) pair production. Now, there’s a problem here:

Now, first it should be clear that, here, particle-antiparticle might also mean positive-negative energy or positive-negative spacetime or anything of that sort. I hope the point is made.

P-AP pair production/creation involves or implies the emergence of P-AP pair from the state of non-existence to the state of the existence of the P-AP pair. Now ‘state’ is the most fundamental entity that defines every thing and the existence and the non-existence in the theory of state[ment]verse. So, this is just another different states; one without P-AP pair and the other with P-AP pair.

Even if seen at this without detail and just on the surface, there is a clear difference in what is ‘no P-AP pair’ and what is ‘P-AP pair’. So, this can be viewed, in the traditional picture, of transition from ‘no P-AP’ to ‘P-AP’. If there is difference between initial and final state, then how is the initial state conserved? Besides, the initial state is not Nothing or Absolute Nothing.

In the state[ment]verse the matter is clear: In state[ment]verse picture, it suffices that there is state ‘no P-AP’, state ‘P-AP’; where ‘no P-AP’ is not ‘P-AP’ i.e. ‘P-AP’ is the ‘Not’/’Not-statement’ of ‘No P-AP’. So, the state ‘P-AP’ exists, state ‘No P-AP’ does not exist, state ‘P-AP’ does not exist, state ‘No P-AP’ exists. Here Everything is [P-AP, No P-AP], and which is Nothing i.e. Nothing is [P-AP, No P-AP], i.e. Nothing is Everything i.e. Nothing = Everything.

Now, the picture that P-AP comes out of nothing and that nothing remains conserved, is not the correct picture. This picture involves something coming out of nothing. Since, there is a clear difference between ‘no P-AP’ and ‘P-AP’, there is no conservation of nothing, i.e. of actual or absolute nothing. In this picture, the “no P-AP” is not nothing, the “P-AP” is not nothing. For ‘no P-AP’ ‘no P-AP’ is not nothing, for ‘P-AP’ ‘P-AP’ is not nothing. I.e. For state ‘no P-AP’ state ‘no P-AP’ is not nothing, for state ‘P-AP’ state ‘P-AP’ is not nothing. The ‘P-AP – no P-AP’, is Nothing, is Everything, is Nothing = Everything

Now, to get the complete and actual picture of P-AP and P-AP emergence from ‘No P-AP’; one way to think about it is to take the perspective or frame of reference that is beyond spacetime, i.e. beyond Block Universe, i.e. beyond Universe, i.e. beyond everything, i.e. Everything. In this perspective or picture, P-AP can be realized as actual/Absolute Nothing, as actual/Absolute Everything. Actually, P-AP can be realized-non-realized as actual/Absolute Nothing, as actual/Absolute Everything, as Everything-Nothing, (i.e.) as Everything = Nothing.

In this frame, P-AP does not emerge out of ‘No P-AP’. In this ‘P-AP – No P-AP’ – the actual/absolute Nothing/Everything is realized. However, this is not a frame, not a perspective, it isn’t any frame. And, therefore, actually, P-AP – actual/Absolute Nothing, as actual/Absolute Everything, is realized-non-realized. And actually, ‘P-AP – No P-AP’ is realized-non-realized.

[NOTE: It should be noted that the difference in P-AP and ‘P-AP – No P-AP’, or the picture emergence of P-AP from No P-AP, is not realized and addressed in the traditional picture. It should be noted that P-AP and ‘P-AP – No P-AP’, or the picture emergence of P-AP from No P-AP, are different. In P-AP, P is a state, AP is a state. P is not AP i.e. P is the ‘Not’/Not-statement/Not-state of AP, and vice-versa.

In ‘P-AP – No P-AP’, P-AP is a state, No P-AP is a state. P-AP is not No P-AP i.e. P-AP is the ‘Not’/Not-statement/Not-state of No P-AP, and vice-versa.]

In this traditional picture, the representation or picture of P-AP is not correct. In this traditional picture, P-AP as a state is not clearly visible or realized. In this traditional picture, P-AP as a state is not clearly visible or realized in the traditional picture/sense. In this traditional picture, P-AP as a state is clearly visible, but not if theory of state[ment]verse is not taken into account. P-AP is not a state however. P is state, AP is state, P-AP is state-not-state i.e. state-non-state, i.e. statement-not-statement, i.e. state[ment]-not-state[ment], i.e. A-NA, i.e. A-B.

The traditional picture of P-AP emerging out of nothing in the traditional or classical sense/picture. To try to see/comprehend or try to understand P-AP, in a complete picture and actual sense, that would be like taking a perspective or reference frame beyond the P and beyond AP.

And to try to see/comprehend or try to understand P-AP emerging out of nothing (actually not nothing but from ‘No P-AP’), in a complete picture and actual sense, that would be like taking a perspective or reference frame beyond the emergence of P-AP from ‘no P-AP’. One must take the reference frame beyond ‘P-AP’ and beyond ‘No P-AP’ i.e. beyond state ‘P-AP’ and beyond state ‘No P-AP’, i.e. one must take the perspective of ‘P-AP – No P-AP’ i.e. of A-B i.e. of A-NA i.e. of State-No-State. Now this doesn’t mean the reference frame of third state/option. This perspective is no perspective, but not even that, and not even this, and not even this. This is perspective-no-perspective, frame-no-frame, state-no-state.

Since frame is something, is existence, is definition, is experience, is state, beyond any state is just another state, but if it not and if by beyond state when we mean beyond all state and beyond all option, and by which we mean that there is no state or that it is not any other state, then beyond state, by this then means and here is, not frame, and it’s not even that, i.e. it is frame, and not, and is, and is not, ….. This is Infidefiception

This is existence-nonexistence, something-nothing, Everything-Nothing, Everything = Nothing, state-non-state, Infidefiception, State[ment]verse.

For this one must take the perspective of State[ment]verse, which is no perspective, but not even that, and not even this, and not even this, … This is Infidefiception. This is perspective-no-perspective, frame-no-frame, state-no-state. This is Infidefiception

This is State[ment]verse.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more