NOTHING = EVERYTHING

What is Everything? Let me define everything as such:

Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’.


So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined.


One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”.
So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on.



So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on.


The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and also the greatest. It is the only entity that exists for itself, i.e. it is the only entity that exists. There is Nothing beyond it. And there is Nothing smaller than it and as its component parts. Also, it is everything. So, it is infinite for itself, i.e. it is infinite.


So, in terms of sets, the set, say, A = {a, b}, such that A exists, and only A exists, A is everything for A. But, unless A is a state, that does not hold. But if A is a state, it cannot be reduced to its component parts. So, a, b cannot be its components. Such components should not exist. So set(s) cannot be state, and so set cannot exist. But if, a set is taken as a state, then its elements cannot be considered as individual separate component parts of the set separate from each other that constitute the set. Any set A, taken as a state, must be taken whole, and cannot be reduced into component parts.


Now consider set of states: A = {a, b}. This set consists of states as its elements. So, set A is not a state, and therefore does not exist, as state is the only that exists and can exist. However, state ‘a’ exist (for ‘a’), state ‘b’ exist (for ‘b’). But, it should be clear that state ‘a’ and state ‘b’ both does not exit, because there is no state called ‘a&b’. To be more precise, there is no state called ‘a&b’, for, or with respect to, state ‘a’, there is no state called ‘a&b’, for, or with respect to, state ‘a’. In fact, nothing can be said about state ‘a&b’ or any ‘not a’ state with respect to, or in the perspective of state ‘a’, nothing can be said about state ‘a&b’ or any ‘not b’ state with respect to, or in the perspective of state ‘b’. It’s undefined with respect to state ‘a’, its undefined with respect to state ‘b’. It’s absolutely undefined with respect to state ‘a’, its absolutely undefined with respect to state ‘b’. This is because for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined.


State A exists for A, B for B, and so on…, and that’s it. Not even “that’s it” part can be added, not even a word can be added, not even this statement can be added, and so on…

For any state A, state A exists. Any thing else is the ‘rest’, is the ‘beyond’, and for any state/space of existence, only that state/space exists. Even the term ‘only’ cannot be considered as there is nothing beyond any state A for state A. There is no notion of that ‘rest’/’beyond’, hence the ‘rest’/’beyond’ is the undefined. The only thing defined, for any state A, is that state A itself. For any state A, state A is everything, and the ‘beyond’ is Nothing. For A, beyond A is Nothing, for that state A. ‘Nothing’ is relative, ‘nothing’ is not absolute.

For any state A, state A itself is the Infinite, it is for, or with respect to, itself, infinite everything.

What this means is that, the collection of states cannot be realized, as the collection of state is not a state. This means that, all the states cannot be realized by all the states. Any state can realize itself. The “states” is not state. The “states” is not real (entity). The “states” does not exist. The only thing that exists, i.e. is realizable, classically, is the state.


Now, states are real, but the “states” is not real. What I mean by that? Let me give an example: Consider temporal states, which we refer to as events in time. Now, temporal “states”, i.e. “temporal-events”/”temporal-points”, cannot be realized. I simple words, we say no two events in time exist simultaneously in that time. No two times exist at the same time.


Similarly, no two space-points exist at the same spatial-points. Or, spatial-point ‘A’ does not exist for spatial-point ‘B’, and so on. In fact, with respect to spatial-point A, spatial-point A exists. And that’s it. It does not say anything about spatial-point B, or C or D, and so on. It says absolutely Nothing about spatial-point B, or C or D and so on. (By the way, “Nothing” is Indefinition, “Absolute Nothing” is Infidefiception). Not even the “that’s it” part can be involved, and not even this statement, not even this, not even this, and so on.


However, we can consider a set of states. Now, with this set, the set/collection of states, is obviously not realizable. However, the elements, i.e. any state in that collection is realizable by, and exists for, that state itself.
So, let’s consider any set of states: A = {a, b}. Set of two elements as two states, for convenience. I again reiterate that, obviously, this set is not realizable, however, the states are realizable by themselves, for/with respect to themselves.


Now, for this set, i.e. considering state ‘a’, state ‘b’, the situation is this: ‘Everything’ is (defined) the following:
State ‘a’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘b’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
State ‘b’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘a’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
This is what everything is for/considering this set.

This is Quantum Superposition.


Now, for any other set of states/statements/things, the same holds.
For example, for set B = {a, b, c}, Everything can be consider as the following:
State ‘a’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘b’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true), state ‘c’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
State ‘b’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘a’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true), state ‘c’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
State ‘c’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘a’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true), state ‘b’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).


Or, everything can be consider as the following:
State ‘a’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘not a’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
State ‘not a’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘a’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).


Or, everything can be consider as the following:
State ‘b’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘not b’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
State ‘not b’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘b’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).


Or, everything can be consider as the following:
State ‘c’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘not c’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
State ‘not c’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘c’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).

This can be done for set with any number of elements.


Now, taking, again for convenience, the set A = {a, b}, ‘Nothing’ is:
State ‘a’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true), state ‘b’ exists (i.e. is true/not false).
State ‘b’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true), state ‘a’ exists (i.e. is true/not false).
This is what nothing is for/considering this set.

Again I reiterate that this is what Quantum Superposition is (isn’t). This is, what I propose, is Quantum Superposition, or what we refer to as ‘Quantum Superposition’. Also, this is what ‘Indefiception’, ‘Infidefiception’ is. (check out article on Indefiception and Infidefiception: https://dhireshkumaryadav114.wordpress.com/2021/03/26/indefiception-infidefiception/)


So, this:
State ‘a’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘b’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
State ‘b’ exists (i.e. is true/not false), state ‘a’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true).
That is,
State ‘a’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true), state ‘b’ exists (i.e. is true/not false).
State ‘b’ does not exist (i.e. is false/not true), state ‘a’ exists (i.e. is true/not false).
Is ‘Everything’, is ‘Nothing’.


Therefore, EVERYTHING = NOTHING.

Therefore, NOTHING = EVERYTHING.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more