State[ment]verse

There’s a reason why there is no reason why we exist. The reason is Nothing. The reason is no reason, and that’s the reason why we exist and that’s why there is no reason for any existence, because reason is no-reason.

But if there is no reason, any existence is justified, even the existence that is not the existence that is “I”, though the existence is existence only with respect to that existence itself.

Nonetheless, any existence A that’s the “not” of any “other” existence B, existence C, existence D,…, i.e. any existence A which is the nonexistence of any other existence B, C, D,…., and vice-versa, is justified.

Therefore, any existence A being the nonexistence of existence B, C,…, any nonexistence is also justified. So, existence is justified, nonexistence is justified.

So, any (relative) existence-nonexistence is justified. I.e. CONTRADICTION is justified.

However, contradiction is not realizable and not realized because realization is experience, and experience is reality, and reality is existence, whereas CONTRADICTION is existence-non-existence, reality-non-reality, experience-non-experience, realization-non-realization, NOTHING-SOMETHING-EVERYTHING. CONTRADICTION is NOTHING = EVERYTHING. NOTHING = CONTRADICTION = EVERYTHING.

Now, no reason is NOTHING, and therefore EVERYTHING, and therefore CONTRADICTION, and therefore absolute NOTHING, and therefore INDEFICEPTION, and therefore INFIDEFICEPTION.

Now, because any existence is justified, any nonexistence is justified. Because any existence is justified, nonexistence is justified, there is existence-non-existence. Any existence exists, any nonexistence exists. So, any existence is nonexistent, any nonexistence is existent. So, any existence is nonexistence, any nononexistence is existence. So, there is existence, there is nonexistence. In general, everything exists and doesn’t exist. Everything exists, and Nothing exists. To be precise, Everything exists, Nothing exists. Everything is Nothing.

Now because any existence is (also) nonexistence, any number of existence is nonexistence. So, infinite existences (states or statements) can exit, not exist. So, “Everything” exists. So, infinite existences (states or statements) exits, does not exist. Zero/no existences (states or statements) can exit, not exist.

Also, because any nonexistence is (also) existence, any number of nonexistence is existence. So, infinite nonexistences (states or statements) can not exit, exist. So, “Nothing” exists. So, infinite nonexistences (“Not-states” or “Not-statements” or complement-statements) exits, does not exist. Zero/no nonexistences (“Not-states” or “Not-statements” or complement-statements) can exit, not exist.

Infinite existence = Zero existence. Infinite nonexistence = Zero nonexistence. Infinite existence = Zero nonexistence. Zero nonexistence = Infinite existence. Infinite existence = Infinite nonexistence. Zero existence = Zero nonexistence. And so on….

Now, because any existence has no reason, or the reason for existence is itself i.e. the reason for existence is Nothing. This is because the reason for any existence being itself or, existing by and due to and because of itself is no reason. Coming out of existence from itself is not coming out at all. (Also, conversely, not coming out at all, is coming out of itself or coming out of Nothing.)

So, there is no reason for existence = the reason for existence is Nothing.

Nothing can be the reason of existence/something. Nothing is this ‘existence-nonexistence’. Nothing is Contradiction. Nothing is Everything. Everything is this ‘existence-nonexistence’. Everything is Contradiction.

CONTRADICTION is the key, CONTRADICTION is the basis.

Now arguing conversely: Any existence is rendered, or is, nonexistence for or with respect to its “Not”- state/ statement, which is “other” existence. For example, for A, B is “Not”, C is “Not”, D is “Not”, … For D, C is “Not”, A is “Not”, B is “Not”,… And si on. Every and any existence or state or statement has its “Not”/Not-state/Not-statement. This state-(its not or its “rest”) is how any state/existence exist, and also doesn’t. This superposition is how any existence comes to state/statement/existence, and also doesn’t. Any existence is a nonexistence for its “Not-statement”/complement-statement.

Also any “two” statement are complements of each other.

So, to consider any existence is to consider nonexistence, to consider any nonexistence is to consider existence. This is because any statement has its Not-statement or Complementary-statement, namely, its “Not” or “Complement”.

So, “Nothing”, for example in case od A-Not-A or A-NA or A-B=(NA), is NA, NNA = A. So, considering only “{A, B}”, Nothing is not A, which means it must be NA, as there are only two possibilities. But Nothing is not NA, which means it must be A, as there are only two states.

Because there is no any other possibility or possibilities, considering “Nothing” as neither A nor NA cannot be considered. Considering “Nothing”as neither A nor NA is to consider third entity/element of set everything; E={A, B}, which of course does not exist. Also, if we consider a third entity, it cannot be “Nothing”, because it’d be something. Also, considering “Nothing” itself as third entity would simply mean no-third enitity. So, “Nothing” is not some third entity/state separate from the two elements of set E. There simply exists no third-entity. Also, A is not Nothing, B is not Nothing. Nothing is not “both A and B” or “A&B, because there is no such elements called “A&B”. Also considering Nothing as A would mean not B i.e.NA, but Nothing is not A. So Nothing must be B. Considering Nothing as B i.e. NA, means Nothing is not A. But Nothing is not B. So it must be A.

Actually Nothing, i propose is this:

1.) Nothing is A, i. e Not B (Not NA or NNA or NNNA or so on)

2.) Nothing is B (i.e. NA or NNNA or NNNNNA or so on), i.e Not A.

It’s a superposition of 1-2, superposition of A-NA or A-B. It’s a superposition of (1-2)-(not 1-2), superposition of (A-B)-(not A-B). It’s a superposition of ((1-2)-(not 1-2))-(not (1-2)-(not 1-2)), superposition of ((A-B)-(not A-B)-(not (A-B)-(not A-B)). And so on. It is Indefiception/Infidefinition.

Same goes for “Everything”. Same goes for set of everything E with any number of elements.

So, any state/existence considered, is nonexistence considered, any nonexistence considered is existence considered, because for any statement there is always its Not-statement, (that defines it in a sense). This is because, any statement defines itself, only and by defining what it is not, i.e. by defining its Not-statement. Same goes for Not-statement, as not statement is also a statement. So Not-statement defines the statement because the statement of that Not-statement is the Not-statement of that Not-statement.

So any existence considered is also considering that existence as nonexistence, because considering any existence is considering/defining its Not-statement i.e. its nonexistence – i.e. which it is not or of which it is a Not-statement, and because that existence considered is non-existence with repect to its nonexistence. So any existence is also a nonexistence.

Now, because any existence is nonexistence, and because any (other) statement/existence that is not that statement/existence itself, is the Not-statement/nonexistence of that statement/existence, any number of statement can exist-not exit. So, any number of statement exists-doesn’t-exist. So, everything exists-nothing exists.

This is NOTHING. This is why Nothing exists. This is why Everything exists with no reason, i.e. with Nothing as the ultimate reason. This is why there is no reason for existence, there is no reason for non-existence. No Reason = Reason. Therefore, this is why there is reason for existence, there is reason for nonexistence. Reason = No Reason.

This is NOTHING, this is EVERYTHING, this is NOTHING – EVERYTHING. This is EVERYTHING = NOTHING. This is CONTRADICTION. This is INDEFICEPTION. This is INFIDEFICEPTION.

Everything or anything exists because Nothing exists. There is existence, because there is no existence. There is no existence actually, which means there is. So it’s not that Something comes out of Nothing, Something is Nothing. It’s not that Everything comes out of Nothing, Everything is Nothing. There is no “coming out”, and yet there is “coming out”.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more