On the nature of Nature

 ON THE NATURE OF NATURE



We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something.


Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake?
Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely random and performs absolutely randomly. There is no need that nature should act in any particular ways remaining within some criteria or laws to establish any event or happening or an entire creation.


There is no need that our universe or any universes or entire creation must be governed by some set of laws. There is no need of making a trip to other universes to experience any other sets of laws and which is different than ours.


The no law or random nature can create an illusion of being in law. This illusion that nature acts in a certain way is just the result of nature’s random performance.


Nature is random and everything in nature in every level is randomly dynamic. To just make a picture of this, imagine a fluctuation of energy in every point of space, or many bubbles forming and collapsing in every point of space. The ‘evolution and dissolution’ of energy is in any amount and in every infinite fashion regardless of what happened and what will happen i.e. there is nothing like cause and nothing like effect and there is no time. Nature has no clock.


Nature creates and decreates any and every amount of energy assuming any and every state randomly i.e. without considering what was created and what will be created.


Albert Einstein can take birth in 2000 B.C. in Mars or at the big bang or in 9015 A.D. in Black hole. Albert Einstein and his birth in 2000 B.C. in Mars or anything, anytime and anywhere is just a particular state assumed by energy or a combination of ‘energy assuming certain state’. In our daily world, we see everything happening in a certain way, everything always working in a particular way, in accordance to sets of laws. We see General relativity or quantum mechanics always working. We see everything in order. But this really need not happen.


This implies that Nature has no intention to construct universes with human life or with more or less than four dimensions. She creates everything and each independent or with no concern to other creation. Your birth (a particular state) has nothing to do with you (another state). Similarly, big bang (a state) has nothing to do with the present state of our universe.


Let us make a clearer picture of this idea. A man is on the road in July 25, 2012 A.D. in Manhattan. Now, Jesus takes birth in say 0 A.D. in Las Vegas. Then a neutron strikes a uranium atom in the little boy. Then the last photon leaves the cesium atom to mark the passage of a next second. Albert Einstein then dies in 4015 B.C. in Russia. Then Werner Heisenberg discovers America with Christopher Columbus. Albert Einstein discovers Special Relativity. A leader of Dinosaurs dies out of cancer. Albert Einstein is awarded with Nobel Prize. Barak Obama meets Abraham Lincoln. Albert Einstein then dies in 1955 A.D. In this way nature creates everything every time randomly. Events like Albert Einstein discovers Special Relativity, Albert Einstein is awarded with Nobel Prize and Albert Einstein dies in 1955 A.D. corresponds to or forms our world with our certain laws.


There is no need that things should run in highways of laws or events must exist forming an unbreakable and continuous band. Albert Einstein in January 2, 1923 A.D. at 12:00:09:08:29:54:00:12:30:41 or say in a photograph taken, and when an electron is in any point of the second orbital of the a carbon atom in his wrist, is just the certain state assumed by energy (like electron, quark, photon & even entire proton or atom, even entire universe etc and their states) or a combination of ‘energy assuming certain state’ (like combination of electrons, quarks, photons, entire proton, entire atom, entire universe etc and the combination of their states). Either we say combination of ‘energy assuming certain state’ or say a single particular state assumed by energy equivalent to or resultant of the entire combination, its same thing. A single state can act like entire combination of many states. Even a particle can act like entire universe.


Similarly, every other and everything is same—‘energy assuming certain state’—which evolves and dissolves randomly. You in New York in July 10, 2007 with a certain past in your memory when your clock is at 02:10:30:53 and again you when your clock reads or points 02:10:30:54 with the common sense that tells about the time flow and also with the past which also includes your clock reading 02:10:30:53, is just a particular state. There may have many other and very different states created in between the state with initial time and final time in your clock and there is also no problem if initial state creates after the final state.


A single state assumed by energy can work like the combination of ‘energy assuming certain state’. This means, Albert Einstein in January 2, 1923 A.D. at 12:00:09:08:29:54:00:12:30:41 or say in photograph taken, does not need that there must be other ‘energies assuming other states’ like crows around or a jackal in some pose or a star releasing its last visible photon or an electron at some point in the orbital of carbon atom. A single ‘energy assuming certain state’ can act like or as if there were billions of particles that make Albert Einstein and whatever around in January 2, 1923 A.D. at 12:00:09:08:29:54:00:12:30:41.


We are just the energy or combination of ‘energy assuming certain state’, like a picture or a film of movie, and our running world running according to certain laws, just the collection of those films making a movie. There is nothing like motion, no any distinction of any kind, nothing like process, nothing like forces, nothing like vector and its conservations and nothing like law. There is just a discrete, independent state of energy which evolves and dissolves randomly.


Practically speaking, if there were two particles, say A & B and they saw each other. This particular state—in which or which says that there are two particles and each knows about the other’s position—can be created in many infinite ways. Either a combination of ‘energies assuming certain state’ can exist or just a single ‘energy assuming certain state’ can do this. We will say that they have interacted by the collision of some kind, either by transferring photon or any other boson or by colliding themselves. But as I said, there is nothing like law or follow up of some certain pattern or any motion or anything like that and that there is only a certain particular state independent of past and future state creating and decreating randomly, there is no need they must interact by transfer of photon or any such means.


There can be two energies assuming the state of two particles at a certain distance from each other and which exists, that we call after interaction, at the same time. Again there is no such need that there must be two energies assuming the states of two particles at the same time—a combination. A single energy assuming the state of either particle that exists after so called interaction can do this. But this can only work when there is no any difference between the states of A & B that we say exists after so called interaction. This is like viewing a mirror, not exactly though. Now, what if there is no symmetry? Then there can be a combination—existence of both states at the same time—as said previously or there is another way. There can be single energy assuming the state of particle A and that exists after interaction and there is collapse of this energy. Then the energy assuming state of particle B after interaction evolves i.e. sates A and B existing at different time. There is no need that the ‘state of particle B after interaction’ should create as soon as ‘state of A after interaction’ collapses. There may be other states created, like Hubble viewing stars in March 22, 1902 A.D. at a particular time or Dhiresh Yadav landing on moon in February 23, 2020 A.D. at a particular time. The point is that there is no need that B must exist so that A can see it or vice-versa. The state in which A is viewing B and the state in which B is viewing A is independent of each other and any other states.


Quantum laws are the description of some parts of nature. This doesn’t apply to nature’s random behavior. It does not matter how least uncertain you are about anything, the things can happen that doesn’t fit within your uncertainty limit. It is possible that you will not observe an interference pattern even if you perform the double slit experiment perfectly. You observing the interference pattern are just one among the infinite ‘you’ observing infinite different or same results of double slit experiment performed remaining or not remaining within our world laws.


Everything is happening or exists, some state which says we are watching the big bang event, some state which says we are watching big crunch or forever expansion of our universe and 15 dimensional humans are in 2 dimensional universes, some state in which there are more than one dimensions of time.


Yes, nature creates every energy states and thus everything randomly, but what are energy states or ‘energy assuming certain states’? Also, though there is no meaning of time, it seems nature also has clock as she creates something and dissolves or change them and then creates other. How could then there be no meaning of time? This seems like a process which is never going to end. How can something create out of nothing? And there is nothing discussed about how anything or any states of energy or energy creates. Does nature create its negative as well?


Negative energy has no meaning as change has been introduced. Change, has real and great meaning. Change covers everything. Energy has no meaning if it does not change and thus create change. Anything cannot exist if there is no change. Mass, charge and everything, has no meaning if there is no change in them and thus if they don’t create change, or simply say there is no change—we say interact. And change happens in any amount in any way. Change is what exists. Similarly, introducing negative energy has no meaning if it does not create change. But it makes change. And shouldn’t the energy change in the same amount like that happens if two equal but opposite energy is created? As said earlier, change covers everything and that there is no meaning of introducing negative energy as change has been introduced, there is no need of equal and opposite energy.


Anything or say energy or “energy assuming certain state” or energy state and thus everything exists only if and when there is change in it. But, when there is change in it, it cannot exist because there is change and thus there is the other energy state that exists. Same is with the other energy state. Change means change from any to any other state and there are infinite states. Change including two states is equivalent to change including any number of states. This property allows everything (every state) to exist and not, at the same time. And this also implies that change itself exists and doesn’t exist, which again, reversibly implies that energy states exists and doesn’t exist.


Time is not flowing and is not like a long string through which everything slides that has a beginning and an end. But, time also is not like a point or 0 dimensional thing as it is already made clear that everything exists and not at the same time. This means time exists and doesn’t. Time doesn’t define change, actually change defines time. The picture of time that we have is just the result of described nature of time and everything or of nature.
There is a mistake in our understanding of nothing. Actually there is nothing existing. Every energy state is nothing, as shown by the above discussion on change. This implies every energy state exists at the same time. The picture in which nature evolved and dissolved the energy states is equivalent to the picture in which all these energy states exists at the same time. There are infinite states that exist. We and our world is just one of the combinations of these infinite states and their infinite combinations. For example, the combination in which World War II started in 1939 A.D. and ended in 1945 A.D. or in which Apple. Inc is the world’s leading Smartphone producer is our, this world.


On the summarization of this, there is a brief talk made on superposition. Uncertainty principle allows a particle to be at many states at the same time until we observe it i.e. until we become certain. For example, a particle can be at positions A, B, C and so on at the same time. By uncertainty, we cannot be certain about the state of a particle, say its position. So, a particle can be here or there or anywhere at the same time and this can be thought as the particle occupying different positions at the same time. But in the classical world or say our normal world, this is impossible and can only happen at different times. In classical world, the particle should move from one position to another or change its position. Actually, both quantum and Newtonian (classical) worlds are true. Particle at position A—a particular energy state—is different from particle at position B—other particular energy state. As said earlier, all the state exists and also they don’t exist at the same time i.e. particle of course is everywhere. The state of you shining a light at that particle and being certain about it also exists and at the same time the state of you not aware about it also exists.


Actually, its not even about “energy assuming a particular state”. As we can draw or visualize from the discussion, its actually about the so called “state” only. So what is state? A state can be defined to be one simple statement or information or code or set of information. So, there is nothing like the entity, actually no need, of having any separate entity called “energy”- which appears to be different than the term or entity “state” when we say something like “energy assuming state”. We can just consider state- an information or group of information. Now this set of information is sufficient to make something or anything or everything exist. Its like a program, a software, set of codes which creates entire reality. The difference from the general program, e g: computer program, is that its nothing about running something or something like time kind of thing. This set of information creates i.e. a state is about something like an electron in the second orbit at some particular position at some particular time or for e g: you 4.00000000…meters left, 3.0000000…meters right, 9.000000…meters above and at 09:00:09:76:45:……or 10.00000…th second with respect to any reference (origin) 0.0000…meters, 0.0000…meters,0.0000…meters and 0.00000…th sec. In simple words, you in a particular photograph.


Now these states constitute the whole everything thus nothing. And if we take a bunch of these infinite states, we can construct our reality, home sweet home.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

NOTHING = EVERYTHING