Dhiresh

                                               Maha-Vishnu: Virat Swaroopa I say there is GOD. GOD is the absence of knowledge, the limit to the knowledge, be it in any frame of reference. This is something that is absolutely invariant, and by the very definition. When people speak of GOD, that means something or some entity that is Absolute, that is Ultimate, that is Omnipresent, Omniscient, Omnipotent, Absolute/Ultimate consciousness. In general, GOD is that which is infinite. But GOD , Brahmm, is something that is not limited by these titles. Therefore, GOD cannot be spoken of, and I mean literally. There is no word or thought or idea or notion that describes or can describe GOD. GOD is limited, not Omnipresent, not Omniscient, not Omnipotent, not Absolute, not Ultimate, not an entity, non-being, something and Nothing, GOD is finite. GOD is limited by these titles. ...

This is presented as a conversation or discussion between the two friends Kri and Udh: Kri:  Hey Udh, Universe came from Nothing. Udh:  No, it did not. Udh:  Universe came from something, something always comes from something. Kri:  Where did that something, from which Universe came, come into being then? Udh:  Well, even that something came from something else. Kri:  And where did that come from? Udh:  From something else. Kri:  So, it all goes back forever? Udh:  Yes. But, it does not necessarily have to be an infinite series of unique events/things. It can even be finite number of unique events or something and be cyclic, you know. Kri:  Hmm…. But isn’t universe this whole everything in itself? Isn’t that every “something”, be it in infinite numbers or finite number of them, all included in the thing called the “Universe”? Doesn’t Universe, by definition, contain all of those somethings? Udh:  Hmm…. Yes. Kri:  So, the univer...

Why do I want to die but can’t. Why can’t i kill myself? As i think this through harder and harder, it becomes more and more apparent to me that this “killing myself” part results in an contradiction. It’s subtle, but when thought very precisely, the contradiction is revealed. Look, the thing is, for ‘A’ to kill ‘A’, A must exist, but if A killed A, it doesn’t exist, as by definition, killing means collapsing existence. So, A killing A results in a contradiction. So, it’s either contradiction or that A cannot kill A, i.e. A cannot extinguish it’s existence, i.e. this existence defined as A, cannot not exist, cuz if it did, how is it existence? But anyway, it’s either contradiction or no contradiction ; A cannot kill A. In yet other words, A’s impossibility to kill itself can also be written as “A cannot not be A” or as, “A cannot cease to be A”. If contradiction is true, then A can indeed not be A. It’s really a matter what space or frame of reference one looks at, or is in. But, then ...

Which way will the electron(s) go in these experiments-the upper (high resistance) way or the lower (low resistance) way? Ohm’s law will hold in: 1) both the experiments, 2) won’t hold in any, 3) will hold in 1 & won’t in 2 4) will hold in 2 & won’t in 1                         ??? In fig: 1 experiment, Ohm’s law will hold (How? and why?-explained later). But, will Ohm’s law hold on fig: 2 experiment, which takes place with a single electron? For simplicity, let us consider that the connecting wires has no or zero resistance or/i.e. wire is a superconductor. So, what will happen to electron(s) when they reach the decisive point [point  “A”  – the point where the path separates into the path to High Resistance (HR) and to Low Resistance (LR)]? What will electrons decide about where to go? The path through HR is a lengthy one, not because it appears so ...

The idea by David Kaplan, Peter Graham and Surjeet Rajendran of the axion mattress used to explain the higgs mass isn’t quite surprising because the idea or similar kind of idea has been dealt-of course not to solve the higgs problem-with space as its center. It seems that the popping out of the number of fields and particles associated with these fields is never gonna end. Isn’t it wise and clever to use space, and before that, understand it better to design a model that lights the whole uncertainty about the very nature of Nature? The fields cannot have their existence if there is no space. The idea is space might be the field of all the fields. Now, any field and its properties will depend on how the space acts or fluctuates. Space curves to create energy/matter. Now, energy is not just matter but, everything is associated to energy and can be defined in terms of it. Its always better to go for the general solution than to run for a special one. Different fields and theories about t...

Quantum Superposition: And, Or,   Also, for any   , Where,  is the complement of And,  is the complement of. Thus,   is the complement of . Now, if any , then all And, if any , then all  .i.e. if all , then Also, if any , then . This can be continued as, And, And,  and so on. So, , Or,   Also, Or,   Where, Or, Or, Again, Or, Or,   Also, Or, Or, Similarly, we can go on. This means that any quantum superposition can be expressed as (or is) the quantum superposition of 0 and 1 (binary digits) or TRUE and FALSE or in other terms (no-existence and existence). And this is the most fundamental quantum superposition state. So, any quantum superposition of states is the quantum superposition of its being (existence) and not being (non-existent). Now, every state in a quantum superposition or say any particle in a quantum superposition of its states acquires every state at the same time. That means every state or particle or particl...

In my article titled, “ Absolutism – follow up 8 “:   https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/09/absolutism-follow-up-8_9.html , I had discussed that the ‘Big Bang’ (BB) point of the universe, is the Universe itself, and each point in the universe is relatively the Universe itself, each point is the relative Universe itself. Also, in other words, the BB-point, the entire Universe itself is the center of the Universe, and each point of the Universe is the relative center of the Universe, i.e. is relatively the center of the Universe itself. Similarly, the center of the Black Hole (BH), the central singularity, is the Event Horizon (EH), and relatively every point in EH is the center or central singularity and the EH by themselves. There is no distinction among the three. Now, how is that? We can see from Schwarzschild metric:                                            Schw...