What is Brahmm (GOD)?

 

                                             Maha-Vishnu: Virat Swaroopa

I say there is GOD. GOD is the absence of knowledge, the limit to the knowledge, be it in any frame of reference. This is something that is absolutely invariant, and by the very definition.

When people speak of GOD, that means something or some entity that is Absolute, that is Ultimate, that is Omnipresent, Omniscient, Omnipotent, Absolute/Ultimate consciousness. In general, GOD is that which is infinite. But GOD , Brahmm, is something that is not limited by these titles. Therefore, GOD cannot be spoken of, and I mean literally. There is no word or thought or idea or notion that describes or can describe GOD. GOD is limited, not Omnipresent, not Omniscient, not Omnipotent, not Absolute, not Ultimate, not an entity, non-being, something and Nothing, GOD is finite. GOD is limited by these titles. GOD can be spoken of. There is word or thought or idea or notion that describes or can describe GOD.

But even then, GOD is beyond and not and yes and not and yes and not and yes and so on, and not…

Whatever I said, is GOD, and isn’t GOD.

GOD is GOD, is true. The statement that “GOD is GOD, is true”, isn’t true. The statement that, [the statement that, “GOD is GOD, is true”, isn’t true] isn’t true. The statement that, [The statement that, [the statement that, “GOD is GOD, is true”, isn’t true] isn’t true] isn’t true, and so on….

This statement that I just stated isn’t true. The statement that I just stated just before isn’t true as well. The statement that I just stated isn’t true as well. The statement that I just stated, along with this statement being stated, isn’t true as well, and so on….

GOD cannot be stated, GOD can be stated. Even this statement doesn’t define or capture GOD. Even this statement that stated that, “Even this statement doesn’t define or capture GOD”, cannot define or capture GOD, and the same is true for this statement, and this statement be stated up to, and upto here, and here, and here and here and here.


                                                 Krishna-MahaVishnu

Words can be written and spoken all the way, but whatever written or spoken or experienced, GOD is beyond, and not. It is like chasing and moving with respect to oneself, with respect one’s own frame of reference, trying to reach and capture or get to or attain one’s own frame of reference, of being, of existence. How can one move with respect to oneself. How can one get beyond oneself? How can one get within oneself?

How can one be out or beyond oneself, as something more that oneself? How can one be within oneself, as something as a subset of oneself?

So the, if one isn’t and cannot be in the ‘without’ oneself as something more than oneself, as a superset containing oneself, and cannot be within oneself as something less than oneself, as a subset containing oneself, then what is ‘one’, and where is ‘one’?

In between?, like a border between them? But, isn’t the one the whole of itself? So, if it involves whole of itself, shouldn’t one involve the “within of oneself? So therefore, is ‘one’ the whole of the within of itself and up to the limit/border of itself?

If so, the beyond it, is beyond its scope or being or existence.

Now, any word/idea/thought/state/existence/experience written, or spoken, or thought of or conceived of or experienced, is limited within that self, within that existence or being. So, it is impossible for any word or statement to reach the beyond, simply for the reason that it is beyond it.

And therefore, the ‘beyond’ of anything is at infinity with respect to that thing. This is valid for anything. And therefore, the beyond is unreachable and unattainable and unknowable. This is what’s GOD.  But again, that also means that the beyond for that thing does not exist for that or w.r.to that thing, as it is never reachable or experiencable and cannot be brought to existence w.r.to that thing.

But, because, as previously mention, and for the same reason and by the same logic, because this itself is some description or “word”, this is not true, for the very reason that GOD is beyond word, …., isn’t beyond word.


Trimurti: Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva

But again, whatever said is no GOD, and is, even to this point, and to this point, and to this, and to this and to this, and to this, and so on, and not.  

GOD, is by definition, Generator (Brahma) Operator (Vishnu) Destroyer (Shiva), and therefore isn’t.

GOD is GOD, GOD isn’t GOD. GOD is GOD-GOD isn’t GOD.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more