Quantum Superposition = Nothing= Something/Everything

Quantum Superposition:

And,

Or,

 

Also, for any   ,
Where,  is the complement of

And,  is the complement of.

Thus,   is the complement of .

Now, if any , then all

And, if any , then all  .i.e. if all , then

Also, if any , then .

This can be continued as,

And,

And,  and so on.

So, ,

Or,

 

Also,

Or,

 

Where,

Or,

Or,

Again,

Or,

Or,

 

Also,

Or,

Or,

Similarly, we can go on.

This means that any quantum superposition can be expressed as (or is) the quantum superposition of 0 and 1 (binary digits) or TRUE and FALSE or in other terms (no-existence and existence). And this is the most fundamental quantum superposition state.

So, any quantum superposition of states is the quantum superposition of its being (existence) and not being (non-existent). Now, every state in a quantum superposition or say any particle in a quantum superposition of its states acquires every state at the same time. That means every state or particle or particle state or particle in a state in quantum superposition exists and doesn’t exist at the same time. And because according to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty principle everything or every entity has at least a least uncertainty and thus exists in a superposition, everything exists and doesn’t at the very same time.

Now, by this property, every state or particle or particle in a state in the universe exists and doesn’t exist at the same time. Or, every state and its complementary state (i.e. any state other than that state) exist at the same time. So, any state and its complementary state (or other than that state) existing at the same time means, every state exists and doesn’t exist at the same time.

So, any state’s existence requires the existence of its complementary states. Also any state can exist in any number as, the existence of complementary state or states insures its existence. But why should the existence be insured?

Quantum superposition is the answer to the question how something comes out of nothing or to the question why there is something rather than nothing.

Actually, something doesn’t come out of nothing or there is no something rather than nothing. Actually, nothing is something. We do not require the popping out of energy and its negative to balance the overall energy amount. Meaning popping out of negative with positive is not because to balance the total energy. Even negative is the complementary of its positive and all other states.

Now, as any quantum superposition of states is observed, a single state pops out and all the other vanishes. But, the observed state requires the existence of other (complementary) state. So how can it be? This can be answered in many ways. First is that, the existence of this state means the non-existence of its complementaries. So, the existence of the state in which or which says ‘Dr Alexander observed electron spin +1’ means the non-existence of the state in which or which says ‘Dr Alexander observed electron spin -1’ or any other states in cases where there are more than one complementary states. Also, the states can be anything not just the states of fundamentals like set of electron’s quantum numbers. It can be a man walking down the street at any time such as 03:00:00:00 PM.

However, the other way to answer the question is that, the complementary state (or states) does exist but because Dr. Alexander who observed the electron spin +1 is not in the state where Dr. Alexander observed the electron spin -1, he cannot realize the existence of state with the electron spin -1. In this way the complementary states exist and don’t at the same time making something actually nothing and nothing actually something. So if there is some energy or something doesn’t actually mean that there is no nothing and nothing has to come out of nothing at all.

Forces:

Now the n different states can exist or anything, any universe or universes can exist because of the virtue of quantum superposition, as their existence is simply their non-existence. But the question arises, why any type of state doesn’t exist. Why only those states that don’t violate the laws of our universe or don’t violate the way in which everything seem to happen in our universe exist. Where are the states that violate our universe’s laws?

We know the laws or the way in which anything in our universe behave or the forces in our universe. We call these principles of forces, the laws of our universe. And the quantum superposition of states only seems to consist of finite number of states that lie within the sphere of these laws.

Although string theory suggests the existence of more than one (10500) or infinite number of universes with the same number of sets of laws, these universes or sets of laws are discrete and not random.

The answer to the question about ‘where the other states are?’, and that, ‘are there only finite numbers of states?’ is that there are infinite of them and because we can perceive them, we cannot realize them. We are those states (set of information) which say otherwise. But there exist those states that also have information that say or talk about the violations to our universe’s laws. There are those sets of information or those set of states that construct an entirely different universe than ours, the universes that have different set of rules, and the universes where different types of forces comes into play.

The actual picture of multiverse is the quantum superposition of infinite number of states (infinite number of states in existence and thus no existence) jumbled in infinite number of random ways. Some of these states obey our universe’s laws, some obey other universes’ laws, some construct magical worlds, some construct or are part of universes with set of laws consisting set of laws of other two or more universes, etc.

So, the laws of our universe are an illusion and are just due to existence and nonexistence of infinite number of random states randomly. The existence of laws require the existence of no-law.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more