State[ment]verse – 4

They say that you’ve been dead forever till your birth, and that you’ll be dead forever after your death. Only that your existence is finite, not your nonexistence.

First thing is: How do you know that nonexistence, Nothing, is infinite? How do you know what nonexistence, what Nothing is/isn’t?

Well, one might say, that’s because everything is finite; everything that we’ve experienced is finite. Whatever I’ve experienced, or whatever is my experience, it’s all finite.

But then, the only experience one is experiencing, that one is, is the present, the current state, this state. And it is the infinite. Any state with respect to itself is infinite, eternal. Any state is the state, and the only state that exists with respect to itself. So, there is no other state with respect to that state, because the other state is, by definition, the ‘other’ state, the ‘Not-state[ment]’ of that state[ment]. So, it eternally, infinitely, exists with respect to itself.

So, finite existence of itself, for any state, with respect to itself, is an impossibility. Finite existence, though, is a possibility in its experience, due to the information stating, “finite existence”, or such statement or experience.

The other way this can be seen is: Since any state is the only state that exists with respect to itself, it is the only state that exists with respect to itself. So, there is no state or no other state that exists with respect to that state. So the claim that is made about ‘every thing/existence/state is finite’ is wrong in fundamental sense. Such experience of experience or existence or things being finite is just due to information of/in that state/existence/experience.

But if anything infinite is an impossibility, then nonexistence is either not a ‘thing’ and is an infinity and therefore an infinite nothing and therefore a possible infinity but an impossible ‘thing’ or existential impossibility, or not an infinity but a thing and therefore an existential possibility but impossible infinity.

But if it’s Nothing, if it’s nonexistence, it cannot be existential possibility. So, it must be existential impossibility but possible infinity. But since it is non-existence, it doesn’t exist. So, in what way can it be infinite?

Well, here a hidden presumption that ‘infinity’ can only be associated, or must involve, or is, existence. This is not true. Infinity, is rather associated, and involves, and is, nonexistence.

On letting go of this presumption (and intuition or gut feeling), one comes to understand, and truely see, what’s being told and implied here is that: Infinite existence is an impossibility, i.e. finite existence is a possibility, i.e. infinite nonexistence is a possibility.

At the limit/boundary/border, zero, infinity, come together, they don’t come together, they do, they don’t, even this is not true : so the other previous one is, even this is not true : so the other previous one is, is not, is, is not,…Even this is not true, not even this, not even this, not even this,… This is Infidefiception

But then again, nonexistence is not a possibility. Possibilities ‘exist’. Possibility = Existence, otherwise how is it a possibility? It’s not a possibility otherwise.

So, infinite nonexistence is impossibility?
Well, with nonexistence, with Nothing, even that cannot be said. We simply don’t know. We simply don’t know what Nothing/nonexistence is.
But then again, can we even say that? or can’t we even say that?

So the previous presumption can be made? It can be made, it cannot be, it can be, it cannot be,…

Nothing is not just another state. But even that cannot be said. But then even that cannot be said, so the previous one can be said. But again, even that cannot be said, so the previous one can. But again, even that cannot be said, can be said, cannot be said,…, previous one can, cannot, can, cannot,… But then even that cannot be said, can be, cannot, can, cannot,…. This is Infidefiception

This is State[ment]verse

At the very fundamental/ limit/base/border/boundary, there is Nothing, there is Nothing = Everything, there is Nothing not equal to everything, there is Contradiction, there is no contradiction, there is consistency, there is no consistency,… So there is craziness, madness. So things appear crazy, does not, does, doesn’t,…

This is Infidefiception

This is State[ment]verse

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more