Absolutism – 21

Is the supreme in Hindu philosophy subject to kalpas or various time periods? Do Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva exchange their roles as supreme and non-supreme depending on Kalpas?

That’s not quite correct. Different Puranas aren’t just talking about the way creation happened and by that who appeared first in what kalpa, they’re also dealing with the question of the supreme, and the supreme isn’t time dependent or time-period dependent. When we say supreme or Absolute, it is not subject to time periods. And this is exactly what would be implied by this logic.

Something absolute isn’t a subject to change or variation, and that’s by definition. For example, the speed of light. It isn’t something that is spacetime dependent, that’s because it’s beyond spacetime, or at the edge or border or limit or boundary of Spacetime. Which also means it’s within the space of spacetime. It doesn’t exist in spacetime. It doesn’t exist in spacetime like other entities do. It defines the limit of spacetime, and therefore it defines spacetime.

Now for the spacetime entities, there is no ‘beyond spacetime’, or in other words, it’s at infinity, or call it the elsewhere. Light defines the border between the spacetime cone, the light-cone, and elsewhere. Elsewhere, and anything ‘beyond’, doesn’t exist for the spacetime entities. Light, therefore, doesn’t exist for these entities like the other spacetime entities do. Light only exists as the basic, fundamental relation between space and time and between spacetime points, and it is what defines the spacetime and its limit. Light or its speed-value is therefore a boundary or limit, and therefore the basis of spacetime.

Light doesn’t exit as some small packet or ball or ray that is popularly shown to be traversing through the spacetime. That’s just done, and we like to intuitively think in those terms, because our brains are wired and familiar with the other spacetime entities that appear to do so. It’s just done so we’ve a complete picture of things within or beyond. We want to comprehend, understand, be certain, and firm a complete picture of reality, and thus exert our influence on everything. That’s just the way Absolutism in every bit of existence works.

If there’s a gap in our understanding or certainty, we want to fill it with the god of the gaps. That’s what light as some sort of “ball in motion through spacetime” picture is all about. That’s what Multiverse is all about. That’s what any god is all about. It’s all about Absolutism. Even my, ‘it’s all about Absolutism’, claim is all about that, even this, and this, and this, even this, even this,…

With any impossibility, there is defined some other possibility. There is always another facet to it. There is always the other, with anything, even this, this, this,…

With any impossibility defined, there is a underlying inherent Absolutism, namely the Absolutism or infinitude attached to that impossibility. For example, it is impossible to travel at the speed of light. This has an inherent feature of Absolutism. The impossibility here has, at its core, the Absolutism.

But this whole thing, also has, at its core, Absolutism, namely whatever it’s saying or implying. Even this, up to here, has the Absolutism-thing. It’s all about, Absolutism, even this, even this, even this,… And by that, it isn’t as well, it is, it isn’t, it is, it isn’t,…

To say A is impossible, is to say, Not-A (N-A) = B, is infinitely possible. But by Absolute = No-Absolute, this is-isn’t true. Because A exists, NA exists. A exists for A, is non-existence for B, B exists for B, is non-existence for A. It’s relative existence. So, A-NA. Therefore, A, NA, NNA = A, NNNA = NA, NNNNA, NNNNNA,… This is INFIDEFICEPTION

Anything Absolute doesn’t exist. Absolute means infinite existence, which doesn’t exit. But then, that makes this previous statements Absolute, provided that implies absolute, and provided that induction or relation or implication from one to another statements holds, or that there is such statement in which induction, relation is stated and is true.

Now, for those previous statements to be non-Absolute, the non-Absolutism must also be applicable to them, and they should also be subject to non-Absolutism. But then that maked non-Absolutism Absolute. So even non-Absolutism or non-Absolute should be subject to non-Absolutism, even this upto here should be subject to non-Absolutism, upto here, upto here, …

If Absolute is no-Absolute, then no-Absolute is Absolute. So, if nothing is Absolute, even the statement that ‘nothing is absolute’ isn’t absolute; even the statement that ‘the statement that the statement ‘nothing is absolute”, isn’t absolute, and so on, and not, and yes, not, yes, not,…. This is Infidefiception

Returning to the Puranas, whatever is going on in the Puranas, the discussion, disagreement, the changing of the supreme character; it’s revealing, may or may not be through silence or implicitly, that there is ultimate or supreme or the Absolute. The Absolute is no-Absolute. The only Absolute is that there is no Absolute. But even this, isn’t Absolute, not even this, not even this, not even this,…


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more