Motivation for Simulation

While there are many factors that could lead to performing computer simulations in massive numbers, one of the important factors which may lead us to consider existing in the simulated reality would be the many existential threats that surround from an individual human to entire civilizations. Maybe the possibly multiple, and even infinite layers of absolute/relative mother/daughter realities is the result of such; digging ever deeper and deeper realities.

As one becomes more and more capable of simulating realities highly tending to the limit that the mother realities is or presents, the more one is inclined towards a ‘cheaper’, ‘safer’, and ‘sustainable’ existence. These simulated/daughter realities are relatively cheaper, relatively safer and relatively sustainable/consistent; they are so if seen in the frame or perspective of the mother-reality. The existence in the daughter-reality and as the daughter-reality is more feasible and more sustainable. Besides, we can program or simulate the simulated reality such that we can experience a greater portion of the reality. We can program everything very similar to the mother reality including the future except we change parameters such that the change keeps our existence on that reality more sustainable and even keep us immortal with respect to that reality.

We’d like to experience our reality, in any way or form, as much as we want, wouldn’t we? And not only that, we’d like to be certain that we do. The answer would be to live in greater degree of simulation or approximation of the mother reality and also have excess to the mother reality.

One of the philosopies that inspire such kind of thinking it the Hindu philosophy; in which there are many, and even infinitely many, layers of reality. This is why the idea that is represented by the term ‘Brahman‘ in Hindu philosophy is infinitely incpmprehensible, and why there are many layers of gods and dieties.

The ultimate/absolute mother-reality is Nothing.

Even if we just consider something like ‘infinitely many layers of the mother-daughter realities’, that by definition, we see that every reality is relatively mother or daughter reality; Absolute nowhere to be found. In other words, Absolute being no-Absolute i.e. Absolute being Nothing, Nothing is Absolute.

If we really think, starting from any finite point, it is impossible to attain the infinite layers of realities; it is impossible to dig infinitely deep. So, if we look in the direction of daughter realities from the perspective of any mother reality, there is limit to how deep down the rabbit hole in the increasing degree of ‘daughterness’ on can go and maybe there is absolutism in this. But if we look in the opposite direction, towrds the increasing degree of the ‘motherness’, up the rabbit hole rather that down, we will see there is no limit; the computational power seem to have no limit. Of course the limit is present in the reality that we’re in, but mother realities are obviously, by definition, infinitely superior when it comes to the computational prowess. So, there is no prospect of the Absolute in this direction. In other words, no-Absolute is Absolute, Nothing is Absolute.

Existence is a consistent war between trying to establish consistency and inconsistency every time shattering that inconsistent establishment. Even this is inconsistent, and not, and is, and isn’t, … Even this is not Absolute, and is , and isn’t, … This is Infidefiception

This is State[ment]verse

This is no different for any reality; be it the simulated reality. There is no ultimate ultimate, there is no absolute absolute; it’s all relative – relative reality – relative existence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more