Existence-Non-Existence is fundamentally undefinable.

Can a statement speak of itself? Can it describe itself? Well, of course it seems. For example, statements, “This statement is about Truth” or “This statement is True/False”, describe themselves. But can a moment, an instant, an event, or a state describe or define or measure or “look upon” itself? For it to make a mention of itself, it should include the description of the state which then in turn includes the mention of the state being mentioned or considered. But then, this has more in addition than the state that’s been described – namely the description of the state. This then makes up other new state that speaks of that state being mentioned. So, this state is basically a ‘state of description’ of the state being described, and not that described-state itself, it’s a different state altogether. So the answer is no, a state/event/moment cannot speak of itself. If statement represents a state or is basically a state, such statements cannot describe or talk about itself either.

For example, consider the state of our own experience. The moment in which we are present, cannot be described. As the description initiates, the state has changed. So, one cannot be in a particular state and describe that state of being, being in the same state of existence. Now because ‘state’ is what defines ‘existence’, and is what truly “exists”, existence when described is no more an existence. As the description/definition of the state/existence comes into being, the state has changed, and that state being described is non-existent, and the ‘state of description’ of that now non-existent state is the state that exists (or is the existence). So existence when spoken of, ceases to exist and is non-existence. Therefore, existence cannot be defined or described.

So, a state cannot describe/define/measure itself. For example, consider a state in which a person P is eating at 10:01:11:19:20, call this state A. If the person describes this, the state of its being will not be the state of the description of this mentioned state A, but some other state. Let this state describing state A be state B. State A is non-existent and state B exists. If state A is described by some other observer or state, this ‘other’ state is not state A. It maybe some state #, but it’s not state A. Also for any state other than state A, state A does not exist. This is because, for something to exist that thing must be experiencable, and for any state K, the state K is the one that’s experiencable and any other state A is not experiencable. Yes, state K may involve description of state A, but state K is not state A, and therefore any state K cannot experience any other state A. To be and to experience is the same, and to be and describe is not. Any state K is the “Not-state” or the “Not-statement” or the complement of any other state A. One cannot experience the other, one does not exist for the other.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more