VISÑU, NARAYANA – The first Field Theory

Narayana or Vishnu is the idea of All-pervasiveness, the ‘All’, the Absolute, the Ultimate, the Everything, the Nothing. Vishnu literally means “All-Pervading”.

Quantum Field Theory emerges as a unified theory that combines the ideas and concepts and tools of Quantum Theory, Field Concept, and the Principle of Relativity – the three major Ideas or sets of ideas in modern Physics.

According to Yajur Veda, Taittiriya Aranyaka (10.13) – Narayana Suktam:


From Narayana Suktam

Also, according to Yajur Veda, Taittiriya Aranyaka (10.13) – Narayana Suktam:


From Narayana Suktam

RigVeda 1.22.20 also mentions the same ‘paramam padam‘ in Narayana Suktam of Yajur Veda:



From RigVeda 1.22.20

Also we have from Vishnu Purana:

Who is Vishnu?

Out of Vishnu this universe has arisen,
in him its exists,
he is the one who governs its existence and destruction,
he is the universe.

—Vishnu Purana, 1.14

From the Vishnu Sahasranama, translated by Swami Chinmayananda; Central Chinmaya Mission Trust:

Vishnu (or Viṣṇu, Sanskrit: विष्णु) means ‘all pervasive‘.

Medhātith (c. 1000 CE), states:

‘One who is everything and inside everything’

Yaska (4th century BCE), the Vedanga scholar, in the Nirukta defines Vishnu as:

‘Viṣṇur viṣvater vā vyaśnoter vā‘

i.e. ‘One who enters everywhere’

According to the Book titled: “An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory“, by Michael E. Peskin and Daniel V. Schroeder:

“Quantum Field Theory is a set of ideas and tools that combines three of the major themes of modern Physics: Quantum Theory, the Field concept, and the Principle of Relativity.“

(Later …..)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more