STATE[MENT]VERSE – Do we exist? Do we not exist?

The answer might be, “obviously, yes we exist”. This looks like a lame question.

But yet, ‘Existence’ cannot be defined, ‘I’ cannot be defined. This is because Existence, or ‘I’ or ‘self’ or consciousness, is the Basis, and Basis is the one that defines every thing that’s based on it, not the other way around. Basis is the Absolute Basis for, or with respect to, itself. Basis itself defines itself, and Nothing else. The Basis is a brute fact for every thing that it defines, including itself. Basis is defined by Nothing, it can only be defined by Nothing and Nothing alone. This is because Nothing is the Absolute Basis, the Ultimate Basis.

If Basis is defined by ‘something else’, then that basis is no more the Basis, it is not the Basis. That ‘something else’ that defines that so called basis, is the Basis then, is the Basis.

But, does the undefinability or indefinability of existence mean it does not exist? Existence or ‘self’ is undefinable, does it mean existence is non-existence?

When we experience, what do we experience? What is “experience”? Well, experience being existence, is undefinable. So there is no answer to that question. The answer is no answer or non-answer.

Whatever experience/existence is or isn’t, it cannot be experienced and also be realized that it is being experienced. They are ‘two’ different states/statements. The experience, call it ‘A’, and the experience that ‘there is experience ‘A” or the experience of the ‘knowledge of experience (called) ‘A”, are different states, they are different experience, different existence. Each exists for itself and itself only, and is the Basis for itself only. One does not exit for the other. They are the ‘other’ of each other. They are the complement of each other. They are the ‘Not’/’Not-statement’ of, or relative or with respect to, each other.

Well, we exist but as/’whenever’ we seek to realize (the experience/existence/state/statement) that we exist, we cease to exist (as that state/existence that appears that we were at) and exist differently/otherwise (as that state/statement which realizes/states that we exist).

From the state[ment]verse perspective or ‘Eye view’, whatever that is, isn’t, is Indefiception, there are two states, considering the case above:

The two states are complement or ‘Not’ of each other. Let’s call the states, state ‘A’, state ‘B’, or simply ‘A’, ‘B’. A is the complement of B, B is the complement of A. A is the nonexistence of B (i.e. the ‘Not’ of B), B is the nonexistence of A (i.e. the ‘Not’ of A). In spacetime ‘Basis’, the states are the events. They do not exist for, or with respect to, each other. They are non-existence of, or with respect to, each other. There is no relation between them, Nothing common. They are ‘Not’/Not-statement of, or with respect to, each other.

The ‘common’, or link, or connection, or relation, be it causal-link/causality or otherwise, is apparent, is all apparent.

The ‘common’ or link or connection or the aspects of ‘induction’/’law if induction’ or the relation(s), is apparent, is due to the information in, or that is, the state/statement. They are fundamentally different, they are not different, they are infinite in difference, and not, there is no notion of difference or relation, and there is, and not, and so on….. This is Infidefiception.

The “we” or “I” that appears as something common, something related, something invariant, something consistent, something law-like or inductive, something Absolute, like the Aatman or the ‘self’ or common experience/existence, is Nothing. It is Nothing. It is apparent and due to the information in, or that is, the state/statement/experience/existence itself. Fundamentally, it does not exist, and does, doesn’t, it’s Nothing. It’s Infidefiception, It’s State[ment]verse.

This ‘common thing’ (in/between states), that’s so powerful and ‘clear’ and obvious, is apparent. This ‘common-thing’, this ‘link’, this ‘relationship’, can be attributed to the Absolutism, or ideas of Absolutism, which is about attaining Immortality, about attaining the Absolute, about climbing the ‘Immortality Ladder’, about the expansion of one’s existence throughout the existence-verse or State[ment]verse.

Every state/statement has ‘Not’/Not-statement. What state A is, involves what state A isn’t, involves ‘Not’ of A or Not-A. A involves Not-A (which can be called B, or C, or D, or E, ….. There is-isn’t A-NA(B). There is-isn’t Quantum superposition. Indefiception is-isn’t Quantum superposition of A-NA(B). Infidefiception is-isn’t Quantum Superposition of A-NA(B). State[ment]verse is-isn’t the Quantum superposition of A-NA(B).

Quantum Superposition is-isn’t. Quantum Superposition is-isn’t Contradiction. Quantum Superposition is-isn’t Nothing. Quantum Superposition is-isn’t Everything. Quantum superposition is-isn’t Indefiception. Quantum Superposition is-isn’t Infidefiception. Quantum superposition is-isn’t State[ment]verse.

The dynamics or motion or notion of motion or Physics, or any Transformation, is, or is due to, this existence-non-existence, is Quantum-Superposition of any state A and the ‘Not-state‘ of A (i.e. NA or B, or C, or…), is A-NA. The dynamics or Physics, is the Quantum-Superposition of Quantum chunks or of Quanta, of existence, of state.

The ‘dynamics‘ or ‘Physics‘, is, or is due to, and is explained by Infinitesimal or the idea(s) of Infinitesimal (see Zeno’s paradox of, or about, rest and motion and its solution by the idea of infinitesimal and calculus), by Indefinity, by Indefinition, by Indefiniteness, by Indefiception, and eventually by Infidefiception.

The Infinitesimal, Indefinity, Indefinition, Indefiception are all (the special cases of) Infidefiception.

The Infinitesimal, Indefinity, Indefinition, or the idea of infinitesimal, is the Quantum, is this Quantum-Superposition of Quantum state, is Quantum-superposition of state. Quantum state or state or existence is-isn’t Quantum-Superposition. Quantum state or state or existence is-isn’t.

Quantum state or state or existence is-isn’t NOTHING, is-isn’t EVERYTHING, is-isn’t Absolute-Non-Absolute, ‘is-isn’t Infidefiception, is-isn’t State[ment]verse.

We exist, we don’t. There is existence, there isn’t. There is no ‘I’ or ‘we’, there is ‘I’ or ‘we’.

There is Nothing. There is Everything. There is Contradiction. There is No-Contradiction/Non-Contradiction. Infidefiception is Contradiction-No-Contradiction. State[ment]verse is Contradiction-No-Contradiction. There is Infidefiception. There is State[ment]verse.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more