Absolutism 12 – Suffering

There is no inherent suffering and tension.

I just ‘realized’ that all this time, the situation was different, and through the situations were different, the tension and worry remained the same, the worry was constant. In all this, i always looked down upon the situation, i hated the situation, i blamed the situation, and thought this situation was constantly coming and going and gradually increasing its frequency and period of stay.

But in all this, on close proper inspection, just as i had not noticed and not been conscious about the ‘Question-Mark’ itself, i had not noticed and not been conscious about the worrior or about the consciousness/experience/experiencer of the worry.

It wasn’t the situation, because situations lot worse or better had been there, but the worry was not different. That’s what was not different or invariant in all this. So, the ‘those’ specific situations were absent; better or worse or any particular situation was now absent, but the worry was the constant or the invariant in all these situations.

Yes, the situations possessed challenges, but it was an apparent thing that the situations were the ones possessing challenges. Situations were not actually the ones that possessed challenges, those challenges were challenges because of the perspective. Or we could say, those situations did possess challenges, but the tension and worry and suffering were due to our perspective of it and or way of looking at it.

It was this invariant thing, this approach or perspective, which was due to the ‘attachment’ to the future or to the results (which is all due to Absolutism), that were the cause of or were the suffering themselves. It was all due to existence trying to exist infinitely i.e. existence trying to become Immortal, to become/attain Absolute, which was actually NOTHING, but the existence had no clue and had no realization of that. This not realising were the Immortality lies, or what actually was Absolute, is the cause of the tension/suffering, or rather is the suffering (itself).

For me, all this linked up to the ambition that i set to achieve with Physics, in the so called ‘physics community’, this goal/ambition that i set to achieve, my view of Immortality, of the Absolute. This was my view of the Absolute, which was a view of Immortality in/as/along/with/of existence, which was a view that Absolute ‘exists’, that Absolute is existence, that Absolute is finite, that Absolute was definable or achievable, or definable or achievable in traditional/conventional/ordinary/usual sense, or definable or realizable or achievable in any sense.

But in actuality, the Absolute is NOTHING, it is EVERYTHING, it is undefinable, unachievable, it is unachievable as any existence (even ‘Not’ of any existence, or non-existence (relative) is not NOTHING, is not NON-EXISTENCE, is not Absolute). it is Infidefiception. It is State[ment]verse

This non-realization/realization, this unawareness/awareness, that existence and immortality can coexist, is suffering. The realization/experience of the state of illusion, of that (state) which cannot and does not exist and is not achievable/attainable i. e. of that, existence can become immortal or achieve immortality, is the cause of, or rather is the Suffering.

This is achievable with/in/as Absolute Nonexistence.

Therefore, the ‘constant’ attempt, that’s inherent in every thing, in every ‘act’, that attempt of ‘climbing’ or ‘stepping up’ the ‘Ladder of Immortality’, in search and towards that goal that is ‘Absolute’/’Immortality’ or rather is Absolute Existence/Immortal-Existence, and that is at infinity, but none has any clue of it being at Infinity, this great ‘climb’ is the great Suffering. This greatest Suffering, is the root or cause of all suffering, or rather is all suffering.

This non-realization or unawareness of that ‘existence and Immortality/Absolute being complement or ‘conjugate’ (of each other)’, this non-realization of ‘NOTHING as Immortal’, this non-realization of ‘NOTHING as Absolute, this existence/Reality trying to exist infinitely or be Real infinitely or become Infinite-Reality, is the SUFFERING.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more