What is EXISTENCE?

It is true, or at least “feels” so, that “we” “exist”. But what does the three quoted (” “) words imply. We “know” what it implies, we “experience” it. What is “experience”? What is “reality”? We “know” what is real, but what is “real” itself?

Is there a beginning? Why is there a beginning? Why is there “why?”?, Why is there “why is there “why?”?”, and so on …..

What is “fact”? Can “existence” itself be defined, can it be defined in terms of the “other” or “Not” of existence? i.e. in terms of what it is not? i.e. by non-existence?

If no, it (Existence) is the Absolute Basis. I’ll go further and extend this and say that, any particular existence is what defines itself and nothing else, and it is the ultimate Basis of itself. So then, there is no “link”/”relation” between any existences ‘A’ and ‘B’, where A is not B and B is not A. Any thing/existence A defines and justifies itself, so is with B. The basis of A is A itself, the basis of B is B itself. There is no relation between A, B, C, D, E, …, – the Quantum or bits or fundamental (smallest) chunks of existence or existence/existential-space, and that includes all relations. This is also true for and no different for the “causal” relation or any relations such as “laws” of Nature or of “God” and “God”, and axiomatic structures, logical structures, etc.

The Absolute answer is “NOTHING”. ‘Nothing’ is the Absolute/Ultimate. This is equivalent to what’s mentioned above that the existence, in fact any existence itself, is the Absolute (with respect to itself).

The reason we have an infinite (relational) regressions like the ones in case of one cause after another, is the inherent seeking or search for the relation between any “two” ‘things’ or ‘existences’, which have no relation at all – are ‘infinitely’ independent, to the point that the term “two” mentioned also does not exit. This ‘apparent’ ‘invisible’ ‘link’/’connection’ connecting the ‘things’/’existences’ is what leads to, and is in fact, this regression that extends to one after another. By the way, it cannot even be called ‘infinite regression’ because no matter how much it extends, it remains finite, never realizing ‘infinity’. The various structures such as “laws” of Nature or of “God” and “God”, and axiomatic structures, logical structures, fundamental structures, structures emerging from the association/connection of fundamental structures, from particle-antiparticles pairs to quarks to nuclei to nucleus to atom to atoms to molecules to complex chemical and organic structures to more organized structures such as DNA, cells, organs, species, humans, societies, cultures, nations, religions, civilizations, any other organizations, etc, are all due to these ‘connections’. This is all in search for extension/longevity – greater/larger/longer existence or sustenance of existence throughout the space of existence as greater as can be, of which longevity is an special/particular case, and eventually in search of existence throughout entirety and infinity and thus the search of Permanence/Absolute/Ultimate/Immortality.

But why are things or existences linked? Linking/relating states and pursuit of ‘common’ in them and the apparent commonality, and the regressions that appear and are so prevalent, is all part of the extension of a particular existence throughout the existential space – the State[ment]verse, and uniformation or unification throughout. With growing ‘uniformity’ and ‘commonality’ and the spread of existence, existence climbs the ladder towards the Absolute. But Absolute being nothing, i.e. ‘Nothing’, Absolute is at infinity. Therefore, ‘Nothing’ being the only permanent and Absolute, Existence is not immortality/Permanence/Absolute. Existence and Permanence are complements. (By the way, note/check out the Energy-Time Uncertainty Principle/relation) But Nothing being Everything, ‘Everything’ is permanent as well. Also, Permanence/absolute/Nothing/Everything being infinite, cannot be defined/measured and thus cannot be attained or achieved.

[Also, any Existence, for or with respect to itself is infinite and is the ultimate basis for itself, so any existence cannot be defined by anything ‘else’ but itself or within itself. It cannot be defined in terms of what is the ‘other’/exterior with respect to that existence. For that existence, there is no exterior or beyond itself; the ‘Not’ of that existence does not exist for or with respect to that existence.]

Now, existence realizing the impossibility of ‘existence-immortality/permanence’, returns to ‘nothing’ and thus attains permanence. But again non-existence in pursuit of being existent attains existence but looses permanence. This whole thing can be put as about this contradiction, and visualized in this format:

https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-story-of.html

Whatever can be ‘achieved’, any achievable goal, is within the finite/finitude. This implies, there is a ‘Not’ of this ‘goal’, there is a beyond or ‘other’ with respect to it. Therefore, it has no permanence/absoluteness. So, any goal achieved is, in a sense, again unachieved, as it is not permanent. Whatever achievement that be, be it one more layer of ‘reason’ or a new fundamental layer of justification/basis – an answer to the next deeper level of the ‘why?’ question, the next ‘why?’ question will present itself. The previous answer then will be useless and no more much fundamental, but the most fundamental to this point nonetheless, and just a new arbitrary entity. The achievement eventually dies out as it is not permanent, no ‘finite’/finitude is.

The only way to achieve permanence is to become one with ‘Nothing’ and thus with ‘Everything’, the only way is to not achieve it at all, and not achieve anything or any existence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more