GOD – What is GOD about?

Remember this: The most fundamental law of Nature is that there is no law. The other way to put it is to say, Every Statement (in the State[ment]verse) has a Not-Statement, or Every statement has a ‘Not’: https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/08/absolutism-follow-up-4.html

Everybody has God. Being “atheist” is no different. One of the belief or 'trust' is the trust in the induction or the law of induction. Only “trusting” “reality”, the hard one, is also no different. No matter what, every thing has a basis, and no matter what, every existence is about existence and its property is to exist and “extend” its existence in the space of existence.

The ‘hard-reality’, the one we generally refer to as the “external” or “physical” reality, it appears one does not need to “believe” in it for it to exist and assert itself. But here’s a thing, even the thing that we so called “believe” is not within our control, “our” or “our control”, in a conventional sense. In fact, the very thing that “we” are, or the thing we call “I” is not in, what we call, “our control”. The so called ‘I’ doesn’t even know what ‘I’ even is. ‘I’, like ‘God’ or infinity or Permanence or the Absolute or the Ultimate, cannot be defined: https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/08/i.html

Everything that we define or that we have is based in the hard-reality, the one that we just refer to as ‘reality’ conventionally. Just as any basis, we cannot define it, but everything is defined in its terms and every definition or thing is based on it. It is the most fundamental thing we know of. What could be more fundamental than existence?

If spoken of truely and with complete honesty, there is no word that can define existence. Existence or reality defines everything, not the other way around. Because it is the basis, and the ultimate one, it cannot be defined any other way but by itself. Any such trial, and any attempt to contain it within ‘word(s)’, is an utter failure. The use of ‘is’ instead of ‘will be’ here, is deliberate and intended.

Seeking ‘God’ is seeking immortality. It is about attaining Permanent, or uniform, existence throughout the existential space. Whatever we do or apparently do and whatever is, is all directed towards that ‘Permanent Existence’. To become something permanent or immortal and exist throughout is the prime. But immortality being an ‘infinite-thing’, the thing that cannot be defined and experienced and that is beyond experience or beyond existence, cannot be attained.

But the most fundamental reason for this is that; Every statement has a ‘Not-statement.

This is why there’s no “Everything”, this is why there’s no “Nothing”. This is why “Everything”, “Nothing”, cannot be defined or measured or experienced or realized. This is why “Nothing” and “Everything” does not “exist” i.e. is not the part of existence and is beyond existence.

This is why there’s no “universal set”. This is what’s actually behind ‘Godel’s Incompleteness‘.

This is why there is 'Other'. This is why there is always a number/entity greater than a number/entity, why for any number there is a number greater than that number, why there is no end to numbers. This is why there is infinity.

This is what’s involved in every thing. This is what’s involved in the war of ideas and ideologies, war between religions and civilizations, etc.

Immortality/Permanence cannot be achieved, as it lies at infinity, beyond existence. Nothing is immortal i.e. “Nothing” is immortal i.e. “Everything” is immortal.

Existence and immortality are complementary of each other. They are ‘conjugates’ of each other. Existence implies no non-existence = immortality. Existence is existence, while immortality/permanence is non-existence – it does not exist – it is non-existent. But every thing that is, is due to the contradiction between Nothing/Non-existence/Permanence/Immortality, Existence/temporality/Mortality.

‘Nothing’, in pursuit of existence when attains existence, looses immortality/absoluteness. Now as ‘Existence’, it pursues permanence/absoluteness. ‘Existence’ in pursuit of Permanence is what can be referred to as the search for God or the Permanence/Absolute. Thus Existence attains ‘Nothing’/Non-existence and thus the Absolute – the Permanent – the Immortal – the Ultimate. However, as a whole, this Nothing – Everything, Existence – Non-Existence, thing -not-thing, Permanence – non-permanence, is State[ment]verse. The term that best describes this is Indefiception/Infidefiception:

https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/08/indefiception-infidefiception.html

I’ve been involved in arguments of ideas; for example, about Vishnu Vs Shiva.

There can at a glance be three, or maybe four, options: One would be to take the side of a Vaishnava – follower of Vishnu. The other would be take Shiva as the supreme. Third would be deny both and claim some ‘other’ deity or idea or belief or whatever to be the Absolute. But then that’s the thing; Every statement has a ‘Not’. Nothing, i.e. “Nothing”, is Absolute.

Existence is, no matter what, not the Absolute. State(s)/Statement(s)/Word(s) is not Absolute, i.e. is the ‘Not’ of ‘Absolute’. Even whatever I said, is not Absolute. This means the ‘Not’ of whatever I said is Absolute. But even that isn’t Absolute, so its ‘Not’ is absolute i.e. whatever I said is Absolute. But then it is not, i.e. its ‘Not’ is Absolute, and son on ….. This is best described by the idea of Indefiception/Infidefiception. Check detail out here: https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/08/absolutism-follow-up-4.html

Now, in all this, can we say that the fact that nothing, or ‘Nothing’, is Absolute, is Absolute? Well, to confirm this, we have to infinitely test ‘everything’ for immortality. To establish that this fact is Absolute and unchanging and non-relative and immortal, this fact should stand or found to stand forever, i.e. to infinity. Which cannot be established. So, not even this fact can be said to be absolute. It cannot even be claimed or said that nothing, i.e. ‘Nothing’ is Absolute or immortal. But in fact, that we cannot establish this fact as immortal, cannot even be established or claimed, and so on….. (This has been already discussed above. This, and such ‘infinite’ regression(s), is best described by the idea of Indefiception/Infidefiception): https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/08/indefiception-infidefiception.html

GOD is about State[ment]verse. GOD is about Generation/Creation/Generator, Operation/Preservation/Operation, Destruction/Dessolution/Destroyer: https://dhiresh114.blogspot.com/2021/08/brahma-vishnu-shiva.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more