REVI interpretation of Schwarzschild metric (Black Hole) – shorts 1

Since REVI interpretation of Schwarzschild metric (Black Hole), unifies the interior, event horizon (EH) and the exterior of Black Hole (BH), it eliminates the traditional or conventional ideas of the interior, EH and the exterior of BH.

In this interpretation, which can be called as the spherical shell model of BH with Quantum uncertainty, the interior, central singularity and the EH are identical. Also, the EH in this model is the one corresponding to the attainable speed limit c’, where c'<c, and thus this EH is larger than the traditional EH which corresponds to speed of light c.

One thing that this automatically does is that this, therefore, eliminates the emergence of gravity from source behind the EH curtain and behind the curtain of central singularity, as traditionally understood. Here gravity emergence from an EH which is has no singularity, as it does not correspond to and does not involve the speed of light in vacuum speed limit c. So gravity can emerge and reach spatio-temporal locations from a source, which by the way is a spherical shell with Quantum uncertainty involved, that lies outside the traditional singularity involving EH.

So the problem of gravity’s emergence from its source, structuring of Spacetime around is automatically and naturally solved. The Spacetime structuring is, here, done by the Quantum uncertain spherical shell source.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more