Infinitesimal

Why do we have something like infinitesimal? Why is it that we have this sense that we can divide things into smaller and smaller parts? Why should anything be made up of infinite number of infinitesimally smaller and smaller parts?

But what would stop us from doing it? Why would something not be dividable any more? What would be the smallest thing that there is and that exists throughout the existence? What could be such Absolute?

It seems that numbers can be divided further and further. It seems there is no such number that is the smallest, and which thus makes up or constitutes every numbers.

What about Physical objects? Well, the smallest we can theorize is the Planck scale and the the one that we have maybe the quantum fluctuations. The tiniest entity in Physical reality could be Quantum bits. There may not be anything that can be defined as ‘smaller’ or that can even be defined. But quantum bits are themselves wavy – continuous. They are not this or that. They are superposition of this and that. They are undefinable entities, just like the infinitesimal.

The quantum or quantum bits of things define the boundary or limit to how definitely something can be known. Beyond this, things are undefined. This is why there is fuzziness about and beyond this. The ‘fuzz’ is the indefinity. It is superposition of this or that, it is the border of definition, it is contradiction – the Basis of definition, it is Indefiception. It is Nothing. It is everything.

The contradiction here is the special/relative version of the Contradiction (the Absolute Contradiction) – the Basis of every definition. Absolute Contradiction is Nothing. Absolute Contradiction is Infidefiception – the Basis of Every Absolute Contradiction, the Basis of every definition. Infidefiception is the State[ment]verse – the Basis of every Infidefiception, of every Absolute Contradiction, of every State/Statement.

In every act, we search for that which is invariant to the state of existence, that which is absolute. We are constantly in search for the Absolute. When we are breaking things to smaller and smaller bits, we are doing the same. This relates to the idea of Absolutism. Something indivisible is something that can exist in every thing. That thing is invariant to any state of existence. That thing is fundamental. That constitutes every thing. It has to do more with being indivisible than being a ‘particular thing’ that is indivisible. There can be many things than just one that’s indivisible. Some may constitute this, some that, some in combination. Rather than just one immortal, there can be many immortals.

Indivisibility is related to immortality. Indivisibility of some thing would be that the form of that thing cannot be reduced or cannot decay to further smaller entities. It means it does not have parts. The form of that indivisible thing remains invariant and permanent.

But Infinitesimal is a statement against the indivisibility. Therefore infinitesimal also indicates no Absolute. Infinitesimal is due to no Absolute. Infinitesimal exists because there is no Absolute. To be more precise, there is no Absolute/Permanent/Immortal/Infinite Existence. Infinitesimal is yet another example and assertion that there is no Absolute. The Absolute is the no Absolute.

Quantum uncertainty and the Quantum bit, Quantum fuzziness asserts that there is no ‘smaller than’. There is no entity that is Absolutely definite or definable. Here the smallest is not the smallest unbreakable entity. Here the smallest is the Uncertainty, or rather the product of uncertainties of the conjugates. The more you know one, the less you know the other. The smallest is the quantum chunk or bit, which is not definite and which, as described above, is superposition of states, i.e. is state-no-state or state-non-state i.e. state (A)-state (NA) or simply A-NA or A-B i.e. existence-non-existence i.e. nothing-everything i.e. statement-Not-statement or statement-‘Not’ i.e. is i.e. is Contradiction i.e. is Infidefiception i.e. state[ment]verse/state[ment]-space/state-space.

This Quantum superposition of states is the statement that the smallest entity is the state. Quantum Superposition implies that the smallest entity is the state. State/Statement is the most fundamental and is the one that is indivisible. To be precise, the smallest entity is the state-Not-state or simply state-‘Not’. To put it symbolically, it is A-NA or A-B. This is just the assertion that Every state/statement has ‘Not’ i.e. Not-state/Not-statement. It is just the assertion that the most fundamental is: Every state/statement has ‘Not’ i.e. Not-state/Not-statement. It is just the assertion that the most fundamental is the Contradiction/Infidefiception. It is the assertion that there is no Absolute. It is the assertion that Absolute is Nothing. It is the assertion that Absolute is No-Absolute.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more