My Password

I bought a new phone. In fact, it’s special for me because i bought it with my first earning. It’s obvious i want to keep it safe and secured. Also, i don’t want my phone being used by anyone. So I Password protected it, with all the apps locked and requires password.

Fingerprint and pattern passwords are common around here. After a while i had this insecurity and i was concerned about the fingerprint-password. Yes my phone had a pattern-pass as well, but i always thought what if someone used my finger while i was asleep? They could have all my contents at their disposal, private or otherwise.

It was an improbable possibility but possible nonetheless. This made me think and dive deep into my thoughts regarding this. What password, or kind of password, could be the best?

Face-recognition is the worst. The second worst is the fingerprint. Third worst is the pattern. Yes there are many possible combinations, but not infinite and it’s not impossible to crack it. The fourth is, to my knowledge, the character password. It’s the most secure among these. There are finite but many many many combinations possible, it’s quite difficult to crack it, but not impossible. In case of other than face-recognition and fingerprint-recognition, the information is in my head, in my memory or, in a sense, in and as my consciousness, as myself, whatever that means.

Now, what could be the password that’s Absolutely secure? Is there even one?

Is there a password, or password-type, that is infinite in possibilities i.e. in the infinite possibility space, but require no infinite or finite “physical” or “external” space?, like in the case of those pattern or character password-types?

Are we capable of thinking anything? of any infinite things? Can we create an information that doesn’t even exist in the so called “external” shared space/reality?, and can we dissolve it without revealing it to the ‘external’ world external or apparently external with respect to or relative to ourselves or our (‘internal’) space of existence, i.e. our consciousness? Can that information not be accessible to any other consciousness or to the ‘external’ world and only to our consciousness that we refer to as ‘I’/’Self’?

There might be that kind of thing or information. That kind of information, or whatever that is, is the ‘consciousness‘/’I‘/’self‘ itself for or with respect to itself. The experience that I am, or that i experience, that consciousness is accessible only to ‘me’ or to that ‘I’ that i am or to that consciousness/self that I am. This, ‘I’, is not accessible to any ‘other’, is not accessible to the ‘Not’/’Not-state’/’Not-statement’ of the ‘I’/’self’ that is I or me or that consciousness/self that I am. In other words, there is no ‘I’/self/consciousness that can access the ‘I’/self/consciousness that is not that ‘I’. In other words, there is no ‘I’ that can access the ‘I’ that is the ‘Not’ of that ‘I’. In other words, there is no ‘I’ that can access that which that ‘I’ isn’t. For that, that ‘I’ must become ‘Not’/’Not-state of that ‘I’. In my case, I must become not-I/not-me. How can i not be i/me?

The experience that is ‘I’/self/consciousness/experience/’feel’/state/statement, being accessible to only that I/self/state, can be used to create such password(s)or secure information(s) or ‘confidential experiences/realizations’, those that the ‘other(s)’ can’t experience, or can only experience by becoming that ‘self’ or that ‘experience.

Now the other question is, are those experiences infinite in number? Can ‘we’ create infinite number of those experiences? Can infinite number of those ‘I’/’state’ be created? (whoever ‘we’ is, or who or whatever ‘creates’ those experiences/states/I) If yes, we could have infinite ‘passwords’ and informations that are secure and confidential and available only to or for us. That’s like saying, we and our experiences, which again we are, are only available to us. In only first person or ‘I-person’, this is like saying, I and I/my experience, which again I am, is only available to I/me.

Therefore, using the consciousness, the pure consciousness, maybe, we can secure our password.

(LAUGHTER …..)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the nature of Nature

Image
  ON THE NATURE OF NATURE We have been discussing about the design and developing new and clearer theories that we think can precisely define the nature of nature. We have been trying to explain her grand creation on the basis of the observations or events that take place around us. We are doing so from the beginning of our human history. We observe, explain, predict and test. The explanation sometime and in some condition agrees and sometime in some other condition disagrees or fails. But still we are confident that we can describe nature of nature in a way that is certain by making a realization that our views still lack something. Today we are known about many subjects of nature but still we believe there is a perfect model that perfectly explains the design of nature. Is keeping such belief a mistake? Nature on the fundamental level has no law. Nature demands not to act in any certain perfect way or pattern. There is no any limitation to how nature can act. Nature is absolutely...
Read more

Absolutism – The search for the Absolute

I often ask myself, what? why?, I can find many hows, so hows are not primary for me. It is the easiest among them. No matter what the answer is, or how many answers there are, it all fades to insignificance. What does not fade in insignificance is the question itself. It stands strong and proud as ever. Trying to find the answer, the search has always been for an answer. The answer that is supposedly nothing but that is expected to be the representation of the Absolute – that which is invariant, immortal, Permanent. But everything, every answer fades and is temporary, goes extinct, vanishes into nothing, into insignificance. The ‘answer’ that was supposed to express and teach immortality, itself fades to non-existence, itself consumed by death so to speak. Never ever came to realization, that the Question that has been staring at me, and that I’ve been staring at, is the one that has never abandoned me. It has always stood there facing the answer that were supposed to destroy it, and,...
Read more

NOTHING = EVERYTHING

Image
What is Everything? Let me define everything as such: Everything is that which ‘exists’. It is that which is ‘real’. It is the ‘state’. Existence is experience, it is measure, it is ‘state’. So, for state A, A exists. For state B, state B exists, and so on. Now, does state B and/or state C and/or any state ‘not A’, exist for A? The answer is that for any state A, the state, any state, ‘not A’ or ‘A complement’, is absolutely undefined. One cannot say that “B exists for A”, one cannot say “B doesn’t exist for A”. So for state A, state A is everything, it is the universe for itself. For state B, state B is everything/universe, and so on. So, ‘everything’ is not absolute, it’s relative. Now, of course, for state A, state A is absolute, it is ‘absolute everything’ for itself. For B, B is ‘absolute everything’, and so on. The thing that needs to pointed out is that, any state is quantized. State is a quantized entity. It cannot be reduced to any smaller parts. It is the smallest entity, and...
Read more