Dhiresh

 

NOTHING cannot be defined. EVERYTHING cannot be defined. Nothing cannot be defined, therefore every ‘thing’, not ‘Everything’, can be defined. People often say, “If something comes out of something, it’d violate the ‘law of conservation”. That’s funny. There is an inherent assumption, though may not be explicit, that NOTHING has or is with or somehow isn’t the absence of the so called “Law of Conservation”. There is an implicit inherent assumption that Law of conservation pre-exists Everything, every existence. There is an implicit inherent assumption that this Law of Conservation survives Everything, every non-existence, that it survives ‘Nothing’, that it even rivals the NOTHING, that it is equal or even more essential or primordial and fundamental and Ultimate and Absolute that NOTHING. There is an assumption that this so called ‘Law’ or Laws are even Absolute and Supreme and Absolute than NOTHING. There is an assumption that NOTHING, or ‘NOTHING’, does not devour this law or any la...

The answer might be, “obviously, yes we exist”. This looks like a lame question. But yet, ‘Existence’ cannot be defined, ‘I’ cannot be defined. This is because Existence, or ‘I’ or ‘self’ or consciousness, is the Basis, and Basis is the one that defines every thing that’s based on it, not the other way around. Basis is the Absolute Basis for, or with respect to, itself. Basis itself defines itself, and Nothing else. The Basis is a brute fact for every thing that it defines, including itself. Basis is defined by Nothing, it can only be defined by Nothing and Nothing alone. This is because Nothing is the Absolute Basis, the Ultimate Basis. If Basis is defined by ‘something else’, then that basis is no more the Basis, it is not the Basis. That ‘something else’ that defines that so called basis, is the Basis then, is the Basis. But, does the undefinability or indefinability of existence mean it does not exist? Existence or ‘self’ is undefinable, does it mean existence is non-existence? Whe...

What is the   Vishwarupa   – the Universal Form of   Visñu , Narayana, Purusaha, representing or expressing? —– Universal/Absolute Quantum Superposition – The State[ment]verse. Vishwarupa  or  NARAYANA  or  PURUSAHA  is Universal/Absolute Quantum Superposition – The State[ment]verse. Vishwarupa  or  NARAYANA  or  PURUSAHA  is-isn’t Universal/Absolute Quantum Superposition – The State[ment]verse. In Mahabharata, and specially in the Bhagavad Gita section,  Krishna  shows  Arjuna  his “Universal form”, which in Sanskrit is  Vishwarupa . This form is expressed, as in  Narayana Suktam  and  Purusaha Suktam , as having infinite (Sanskrit: सहश्र – literal meaning is ‘thousands’, but it is a metaphor for ‘Infinite’) heads, arms, and forms. This reveals multiple forms, stating that Krishna is Everything. It is stated that this form is not conceivable, and requires the so called Divya dristi ...

NOTHING cannot be defined. EVERYTHING cannot be defined. Nothing cannot be defined, therefore every ‘thing’, not ‘Everything’, can be defined. People often say, “If something comes out of something, it’d violate the ‘law of conservation”. That’s funny. There is an inherent assumption, though may not be explicit, that NOTHING has or is with or somehow isn’t the absence of the so called “Law of Conservation”. There is an implicit inherent assumption that Law of conservation pre-exists Everything, every existence. There is an implicit inherent assumption that this Law of Conservation survives Everything, every non-existence, that it survives ‘Nothing’, that it even rivals the NOTHING, that it is equal or even more essential or primordial and fundamental and Ultimate and Absolute that NOTHING. There is an assumption that this so called ‘Law’ or Laws are even Absolute and Supreme and Absolute than NOTHING. There is an assumption that NOTHING, or ‘NOTHING’, does not devour this law or any la...

What is there to observe when the observer itself is no-observer? What is there to experience when the experiencer itself is no-experiencer? What is there to experience when the experience itself is no-experience? What is there to exist when the existence itself is non-existence? What is there to be when the being itself is non-being? We die, it seems so normal about something so abnormal. It is abnormal because it is so inconceivable for those who die. Sleep isn’t abnormal, but death is? This is because sleep is, or appears, temporary, but death seems eternal with repect to one who dies, going even beyond time. This is because Death is Nothing, and Nothing is all-pervading [ Visñu ], even beyond time, beyond ‘space(s)’. (By the way, Nothing is Everything, Everything is all-pervading [ Visñu ], even beyond time, beyond ‘space(s)’). It seems inconceivable that this, that seems like ‘me’, will go out of existence forever. This is the only infinity, that is achievable. This is the only Ab...

The answer might be, “obviously, yes we exist”. This looks like a lame question. But yet, ‘Existence’ cannot be defined, ‘I’ cannot be defined. This is because Existence, or ‘I’ or ‘self’ or consciousness, is the Basis, and Basis is the one that defines every thing that’s based on it, not the other way around. Basis is the Absolute Basis for, or with respect to, itself. Basis itself defines itself, and Nothing else. The Basis is a brute fact for every thing that it defines, including itself. Basis is defined by Nothing, it can only be defined by Nothing and Nothing alone. This is because Nothing is the Absolute Basis, the Ultimate Basis. If Basis is defined by ‘something else’, then that basis is no more the Basis, it is not the Basis. That ‘something else’ that defines that so called basis, is the Basis then, is the Basis. But, does the undefinability or indefinability of existence mean it does not exist? Existence or ‘self’ is undefinable, does it mean existence is non-existence? Whe...

Narayana or Vishnu is the idea of All-pervasiveness, the ‘All’, the Absolute, the Ultimate, the Everything, the Nothing. Vishnu literally means “All-Pervading”. Quantum Field Theory emerges as a unified theory that combines the ideas and concepts and tools of Quantum Theory, Field Concept, and the Principle of Relativity – the three major Ideas or sets of ideas in modern Physics. According to Yajur Veda,  Taittiriya Aranyaka  (10.13) – Narayana Suktam: From Narayana Suktam Also, according to Yajur Veda,  Taittiriya Aranyaka  (10.13) – Narayana Suktam: From Narayana Suktam RigVeda 1.22.20 also mentions the same ‘ paramam padam ‘   in Narayana Suktam of Yajur Veda: From RigVeda 1.22.20 Also we have from Vishnu Purana: Who is Vishnu? Out of Vishnu this universe has arisen, in him its exists, he is the one who governs its existence and destruction, he is the universe. — Vishnu Purana , 1.14 From the Vishnu Sahasranama, translated by Swami Chinmayananda; Ce...

The earliest record of me asking myself “why something rather than nothing”, is in 2012 CE: Dear Dairy : Record from the past – 2012 CE : Nature fundamentally has no laws – Page 1 Dear Dairy : Record from the past – 2012 CE : Nature fundamentally has no laws – Page 2 As far as I remember, as far as my memory is concerned, I’ve asked this question to myself was about 2007-2008 CE and 2008-2009 CE. It was during my grade 7-8, and 8-9 days. In grade 8 we had the first board exam, which was called the district level examination. I’m fond of these years of my life, it brought about a big bang of ideas and speculations and thoughts in me, specially the volcanic exciting ideas, thoughts and knowledge about the universe and existence. It was before or about this time we had installed the ‘very new in market’ Encyclopedia software in our 1995-98 CE bought Pentium II computer, that initially I had no idea about but soon became a universe of wonders and amazement to me. It was my Guru, one which ...